About



Schedule




Directions



Schedule:

Talks will be at Ryerson 251. Lunch and coffee at the Barn (Ryerson 352). Door will be open on Eckhart Hall

Friday.

Lunch at noon, at the Barn (Ryerson Hall 352).
1:15 - 2:00 -- Stephen G. Simpson. Some aspects of reverse mathematics
2:15 - 3:00 -- Steffen Lempp. Reverse mathematics and first-order arithmetic
Coffee break
3:30 - 4:15 -- Carl Jockusch. Ramsey's Theorem and arithmetic comprehension
4:30 - 5:15 -- Jiayi Liu. Cone avoid closed sets induced by non-enumerable trees within partition

Saturday.

Breakfast at 9:30, at the Barn (Ryerson Hall 352)
9:55 - 10:10 -- Presentation of the Reverse Math Zoo by Damir Dzhafarov
10:15 - 11:00 -- Jeff Hirst. Two combinatorial proofs and some related questions
11:15 - 12:00 -- Carl Mummert. Reverse mathematics of principles equivalent to the axiom of choice
Lunch
2:15 - 3:00 -- Michael Rathjen. Omega models and well-ordering principles
3:15 - 4:00 -- Jeremy Avigad. Computability, constructivity, and convergence in measure theory
Coffee Break
4:30 - 5:15 -- Andreas Weiermann. Well partial orders and reverse mathematics
5:30 - 6:15 -- Alberto Marcone. The strength of 'interval wqos are bqos'

Sunday.

Breakfast at 9:00, at the Barn (Ryerson Hall 352)
9:15 - 10:00 -- Peter Cholak. Some projects in Reverse Mathematics
10:15 - 11:00 -- Theodore A. Slaman. Infinite Random Sequences and First Order Consequences
11:15 - 12:00 -- Richard A. Shore. Weak Principles and Low Levels of Induction
Lunch


Abstracts:

Jeremy Avigad
Title: Computability, constructivity, and convergence in measure theory
Abstact: When confronted with a nonconstructive theorem, those interested in computational and constructive aspects of mathematics have various options: they can seek constructive and computational versions of the theorem in question; they can calibrate the extent to which the given theorem it nonconstructive; and they can look for computational or other explicit information hidden in the proof. I will discuss measure-theoretic convergence theorems that come up in the study of dynamical systems and stochastic processes, and give examples of all three approaches to understanding their constructive content.

Peter Cholak
Title: Some projects in Reverse Mathematics
Abstract: We will discuss some recent work in reverse mathematics.  We will discuss a recent paper of Cholak, Galvin, and Solomon relating Ramsey's theorem,  infinite traceable graphs and finitely generated infinite lattices, an ongoing project of Cholak and Dzhafarov, Schweber, Shore on c.e. and co-c.e. partial orders and work of Cholak's student, Flood, that will appear in Flood's Ph.D. thesis, hopefully in 2012.  If time permits other ongoing projects might be discussed.

Jeff Hirst 
Title: Two combinatorial proofs and some related questions
Abstract:  We will examine the proof that Hindman's theorem implies arithmetical
comprehension and the proof that Ramsey's theorem for pairs implies Friedman's
free set theorem for pairs with the goal of revealing a common theme.  The talk
will conclude with a list of questions about related combinatorial theorems.

Carl Jockusch
Title:   Ramsey's Theorem and arithmetic comprehension
Abstract:  This will be an elementary expository talk on the strength of various forms of Ramsey's Theorem in comparison with the system ACA_0. In particular, it will include a description of a simplified proof (due to Damir Dzhafarov and me) of David Seetapun's 1995 result that Ramsey's theorem for pairs does not imply ACA_0  in the base system RCA_0.

Steffen Lempp
Title: Reverse mathematics and first-order arithmetic
 Abstract: I will start by giving a brief introduction to the work of Paris and others from the 1970's about theories of first-order arithmetic. I will then connect this to more recent work in reverse mathematics, focusing on the first-order consequences of second-order theories, in particular those arising from Combintorics.


Jiayi Liu
Title: Cone avoid closed sets induced by non-enumerable trees within partition
Abstract: The relation between combinatorial property and computational property of “an object” (a real, a set of real or so) has recently draw some attention. We sketch a proof of one of such theorem that, for a given \Pi^1_0 binary tree T, and a set C, if C does not compute a strong enumeration of T (in a non-trivial way), then for every set A, there exists an infinite subset G of either A or its complement, such that the joint degree of C and G also does not compute any strong enumeration of T. We give applications of this result including, RT_2^2 does not imply WWKL_0.

Alberto Marcone
Title: The strength of 'interval wqos are bqos'
Abstract: In 2006 Pouzet and Sauer proved the following theorem: if an interval order is wqo, then it is bqo. We present some preliminary results about the reverse mathematics of this theorem, showing connections with some of the open problems in this area, such as the Generalized Higman's Theorem and '3 is bqo'.

Carl Mummert
Title:  Reverse mathematics of principles equivalent to the axiom of choice
Abstract: We study the reverse mathematics of certain maximality principles that are known to be equivalent to the axiom of choice when formalized in $\mathsf{ZFC}$.  These principles have a surprising range of strengths, including examples that are equivalent to full second-order arithmetic and an example that is weaker than $\mathsf{ACA}_0$ and incomparable with $\mathsf{WKL}_0$.  Our work also illustrates the inner combinatorics of the principles, which can be obscured in the context of set theory. This is joint work with Damir Dzhafarov.

Michael Rathjen
Title: Omega models and well-ordering principles
Abstract. The purpose of this talk is to present a general methodology which in many cases allows one to establish an equivalence between two types of statements. The first type is concerned with the existence of omega models of a theory whereas the second type asserts that a certain (usually well-known) elementary operation on orderings preserves the property of being well-ordered. These results were inspired by work of Friedman, Marcone and Montalban.  The primordial example is Friedman's characterization of the theory ATR_0 by means of a Pi-1-2 sentence of the form "if X is well ordered then f(X) is well ordered", where f is a standard proof theoretic function from ordinals to ordinals. The approach taken here, however, is rather different in that the methods used are purely proof-theoretic and crucially involve cut elimination theorems in infinitary logic with ordinal bounds.
 One could perhaps generalize and say that every cut elimination theorem in ordinal-theoretic proof theory encapsulates a theorem of this type. It is also interesting to ponder the question whether the technique has the potential for generalization, namely whether it can be lifted up to beta-models and functors acting on ordinal functions.

Richard A. Shore
Title: Weak Principles and Low Levels of Induction
Abstract:  Our usual approach in talks on reverse mathematics is to simplify the situation by taking the computational point of view and dealing only with standard models. In this talk, we will instead try to present some of the delicate issues that arise when one is faced with proofs or constructions that (seem to) need more induction than the standard base theory (RCA_0) provides. These issues arise both when one chooses (among classically equivalent versions of) basic definitions and again when one does proofs and constructions. We will discuss the types of problems that arise and various ways of dealing with them: choosing the "right" definitions and theorems, giving "better" proofs or showing that more induction is "really needed". We will draw our examples primarily from recent work with Hirschfeldt and Lange on homogenous models and some earlier work with Hirschfeldt and Slaman on atomic models.

Stephen Simpson
Title: Some aspects of reverse mathematics
Abstract: In this talk we comment on some philosophical aspects of reverse mathematics.  Among the philosophical issues considered are finitism, potential infinity, actual infinity, predicativity, and predicative reductionism.  In addition, we take this opportunity to announce some new results concerning algorithmic randomness, Kolmogorov complexity, and the reverse mathematics of measure theory.

Theodore A. Slaman
Title: Infinite Random Sequences and First Order Consequences
Abstract:  We will discuss the question of what first-order or number-theoretic consequences can be drawn from the second order hypothesis that for every real X there is another Y such that Y is random relative to X.
 
Andreas Weiermann
Title: Well partial orders and reverse mathematics
Abstract: Harvey Friedman showed that ATR_0 does not prove Kruskal's theorem. Following this line of research we discuss the role of well partial orders in reverse mathematics with a particular emphasis on recent developments.